FAHRENHEIT
451 – RAY BRADBURY
“Oh that Tower of Babel they knew what they were after. They
knew what they were after.”
Patti Smith – Land.
When in 1953 Ray Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit 451, little could
he have known at the time but he was touching upon something of much significance. Alongside the other great future dystopia novels like
Brave New World and 1984, Fahrenheit 451 unexpectedly now stands as being
the most accurate vision of how the world might one day be. What Bradbury was doing was presenting a future vision that today is
actually very recognisable. You can ignore the whole aspect of it
regarding firemen going out and setting fire to houses found to be
containing books because essentially that's just a plot device to
carry forward the main idea. No, the real story is in his
depiction of a society where wall-to-wall entertainment is constantly
at hand so as there to be no need to think about anything else.
There's a telling paragraph half-way into Fahrenheit 451 where the
fireman, Montag, rants at his wife about the jet bombers crossing the
sky over his house: '”Jesus God,” says Montag “Every
hour so many damn things in the sky! How in hell did those bombers
get up there every single second of our lives! Why doesn't someone
want to talk about it? We've started and won two atomic wars since
1960. Is it because we're having so much fun at home we've forgotten
the world? Is it because we're so rich and the rest of the world's so
poor and we just don't care if they are? I've heard rumours: the
world is starving, but we're well fed. Is it true, the world works
hard and we play? Is that why we're hated so much?”'
This one paragraph in itself can easily be translated to today's
world where there is never-ending war in the Middle East, unimpressive narcissists in governments everywhere constantly on the verge of setting off
World War Three, constant economic doom and gloom, and massive
inequality both locally and globally with nobody ever asking 'Why?'
or 'How did this all come about?'
In Bradbury's book the entertainment is represented by a sort of
inter-active television system that 'talks' to the individual viewer.
Giant plasma screens are built into the wall of the home (or all four
walls if it can be afforded) which show a constant stream of soap
operas, game shows and advertisements. Even when asleep, a 'shell'
can be inserted into the ear to keep up the same constant stream.
Essentially, Bradbury appears to be predicting the advent of the
Internet but at the same time he highlights the fact that none of it
is imposed from above as a form of oppression but sanctioned,
endorsed and lapped up from below.
Anything that might potentially counter the entertainment and
subsequently jeopardise people's happiness – such as books, for
example – is made less and less welcome until it's eventually
banned. Bradbury's firemen are simply the guardians of society's
happiness and therefore burn books for they contain nothing but the
destructive seeds of unhappiness.
Montag, the main protagonist, however, starts to have doubts. There's
something in the way the world is that isn't right, he feels. Why do
people never talk about anything of interest, he wonders? Why doesn't
anyone listen anymore? Why would someone choose to burn themselves to
death alongside the burning of their books? Surely, there must be
more to life than this? But for Montag there is nowhere to go to for answers apart from,
perhaps, the very things he has spent his whole adult life
destroying: Books.
'”It's not books you need,” an old English professor
advises him, however “It's some of the things that once were in
books. The same infinite detail and awareness could be projected
through the radios and televisors, but are not. No, no, it's not
books at all you're looking for! Take it where you can find it, in
old phonograph records, old motion pictures, and in old friends; look
for it in nature and look for it in yourself. Books were only one
type of receptacle where we stored a lot of things we were afraid we
might forget. There is nothing magical in them at all. The magic is
only in what books say, how they stitched the patches of the universe
together into one garment for us.”'
And that's the nub: Why do some people still desire and look for that
magic while so many others don't? Why do some people choose to read
books in a quest for that magic while so many others choose not to
look for it anywhere at all? Why do some people take the time to read
a book while so many others just want the summary or the soundbite?
Are books actually still of any value in today's world or are there
other things, other receptacles that have taken their place? If so,
are these other receptacles of the same quality? Do they still convey
the magic? Are books still worth the effort? Are people bored with
books? Are people bored of reading? More pertinently, why are people more than happy to scroll past
hundreds of Facebook posts but can't be bothered to read a longer
post on a blog?
There's a scene in Mike Leigh's film, Naked, where the anti-hero,
Johnny, rants at his girlfriend: “Was I bored?” he asks
her “No, I wasn't fuckin' bored. I'm never bored. That's the
trouble with everybody - you're all so bored. You've had nature
explained to you, and you're bored with it. You've had the living
body explained to you, and you're bored with it. You've had the
universe explained to you, and you're bored with it. So now you just
want cheap thrills and like plenty of 'em, and it doesn't matter how
tawdry or vacuous they are as long as it's new, as long as it flashes
and fucking bleeps in forty different colours. Well, whatever else
you can say about me, I'm not fuckin' bored.”
Is this how the world now stands? Are the rants of Johnny in Naked
and Montag in Fahrenheit 451 approximate depictions of the world
today? Bored to death but enthralled to a vacuous tawdriness that
flashes and bleeps in forty different colours? Built upon a funeral
pyre of books?
Fahrenheit 451 isn't a masterpiece of literature by any means but
it's certainly interesting, particularly so for anyone with an
appreciation of books. French film director Francois Truffaut
obviously thought so as well because he made a film of it in 1966
starring Julie Christie. The title, of course, has now entered into
common language and that in itself marks it out as being worthy of
attention – it being the temperature at which paper burns. The
irony being that Fahrenheit 451 is also a very entertaining read...
John Serpico