SERPICO
- PETER MASS
My
namesake! I must, however, inform you that for such a classic film,
the book that it's based upon is a pretty dense affair and rather
disappointing. Written
by Peter Mass, Serpico is the story of Frank Serpico, a New
York City cop whose boyhood dream of what a police officer should be
clashes with the reality and the actual practises of those in that
job. It's a story of morals, essentially. A story of non-conformity,
bravery and above all, integrity.
Set
in the 1960s and based on real life events, it details the
progression of Frank Serpico from rookie to plainclothes cop and his
encountering of entrenched, systematic corruption all along the way.
Serpico's dream is to become a detective but the reality of law
enforcement in New York comes at complete odds with his perception of
what the role of a police officer should actually be.
The
doubts start with just little things such as seeing how officers on
the beat are given free meals at certain cafés in return for special
treatment as in swift, unquestioned action whenever there might be
any trouble at the premises. Or how officers would physically assist
bailiffs with evictions when they were meant only to be there to
maintain peace. Or how officers would set up places around the city
for them to sleep or to play cards with fellow officers when they
were meant to be on duty. To Serpico these are all indications of 'a
growing estrangement between the police and much of the public, a
breakdown of respect - a feeling that too many cops were taking
whatever they could and not caring what anyone thought'; exemplified
by such comments from fellow officers as: 'The public, what does the
fucking public know?'.
As
Serpico slowly progresses up through the police ranks, the corruption
he bears witness to becomes ever more pronounced and excessive;
involving bribes from and extortion of racketeers, criminals and the
general public alike. Gravitating toward the bohemian Greenwich
Village area of the city he starts to identify and feel more at home
with the community there than with his work colleagues. He grows a
beard, grows his hair long and starts wearing bracelets and sandals
ostensibly as his undercover police disguise but something else is
going on: Serpico is going hippy and in more ways than one.
He
comes to realise that marijuana is not the road to perdition and that
his neighbours are by and large gentle and law-abiding. He starts to
side with them and they in turn - little knowing that he's a cop -
quickly accept him as one of their own, nodding and smiling at him on
the street and saying 'Peace, brother' when walking by. On the other
hand, when passing fellow police officers on the street whilst in his
hippy garments all he gets is a sense of reflexive hostility.
Serpico
refuses to take bribes, pay-offs or to take part in the police-run
protection rackets and to his colleagues soon becomes an object of
suspicion and contempt. When attempting to get the issue of police
corruption addressed by his superiors he is met with rejection,
avoidance and fobbing off, resulting in him becoming probably the
most isolated man in New York: living a lie in his job and - because
his neighbours don't know he's a cop - living a lie in Greenwich
Village. Finally, after threatening to go to 'outside agencies' an
investigation is set up but for Serpico this is just the start of his
troubles.
Released
in 1973, the film of the book featured another towering performance
from Al Pacino in the lead role and perhaps it's because of this that
the book is diminished? It's a good story and obviously all the
ingredients were there for a good film but the book is just too dry,
full of unnecessary detail. I was expecting or hoping for a good
novel - a ripping yarn - but instead got a book-length magazine
article.
The
subject of corruption and whistle blowing is, however, just as
relevant today if not more so than as it was when the book first
appeared what with Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning, Julian Assange,
(and in the UK) the Stephen Lawrence case, Hillsborough, Orgreave,
cash-for-questions, Libor, parliamentary expenses and so on and so
on and so on. It's shameful, really. Throughout both the public and
private sector corruption is rife with apparently almost everyone out
to get what they can for themselves. If it's a given that corruption
is rife at the bottom - and I assure you it is - then it's a given
that it's going to be far worse and far bigger the further up the
chain you go. As has been shown.
Serpico
ended up siding with the alternative values of the hippy community of
New York at that time and it was these very values that - kind of -
won out in the end with regard to the corruption at the New York
Police Department. It's interesting to see then that nowadays any
such similar values are denigrated, side-lined and belittled; viewed
as naive, treated as a joke and ultimately truncheoned into
submission. It's also interesting to see that modern-day undercover
cops such as Mark Kennedy have not the slightest hint of integrity
and do exactly as their masters bid; who these days actually view
hippy/alternative/activist communities as an enemy within, to be
tracked, disrupted and ultimately disabled.
So
has all this come about by accident or design?
Our
time on this earth is so very short so should we spend it trying to
grab all we can or follow the example Serpico (and others as
mentioned above) set and do what we know is right even if it means
ridicule, ostracism, and potentially very real danger? Should we have
the courage of our convictions or should we when in Rome do as the
Romans?
Should
we create? Should we rebel? Even though it's done in a long-winded
way, these are the questions that Peter Maas's Serpico puts before us
and leaves only for us to answer.
John Serpico
Is whistleblowing always a good thing? If one is aware of corruption, even at a low level should it be reported? Where do you draw the line between someone stealing a pencil and stealing hundreds of thousands in their public sector job?
ReplyDelete